Hey, Big Bang Lovers , Do you love reading Science books , Science articles ?
Obviously you love, that is why you came here.
I was talking about “reading a book” , While reading a Science book , I see two kind of people
- One who start believing in advance that everything written in Particular science book is true and then he begin to read it..
- Others who Neither believe it to be true nor false but they read it and measure it on the Libra of logic.
Unfortunately these “others” are very few people and we call these few as “Scientists” , only such people can be called as scientist , rarely you will find such scientists who are really fare , perfectly fare and these are “Real Scientist” and only they can detect subtle problems in a theory.
Let’s talk about “Big-Bang“
Story Of Big Bang Theory
Whenever asked –
How universe came into existence?
We say it was all started with a bang – The big bang theory.
In modern science mostly all Scientists agree with this theory ,Yet there are many theories available .
Some of the scientist who disagree with big-bang, they don’t have some valid reason instead they just believe in their own theory.
Well , we are here to know validity of this theory.
Let us have look at What big bang theory is ?
The big bang theory states-
Initially, In the beginning whole mass of universe was confined into a single point of zero radius, this is described as the initial state of universe known as Singularity.
When asked what was before that , Scientist have no answer and they don’t have interest to ponder over it. A bang/Explosion occurred on that point , the mass came out of that point ,faster than the speed of light, or we can say universe expanded with a speed greater than speed of light.
Slowly, As the material cooled down , things started to form.
Creation took place from smallest particles to the biggest objects.
Today, we are living in this universe which took millions of years to form.
In the beginning the point of singularity had
- Infinite density
- Infinite intensity of light
- Time stopped there or there was no “Time”
- Infinite mass in Zero Volume
- Infinite Temperature
- Even “Space” was not existed.
Scientist tells us that after 10ˆ-34 (10 to the power) seconds of explosion two force were produced.
This fact will be further useful in analysis of big bang ,Yet we have gone through big bang theory and it’s facts. Let’s check how valid it is:
Various Horrible Mistakes In Big Bang Theory
1.Impossibility Of Infinite Mass Within Zero Volume
Suppose if I give you a task to fill 1 liter of water into a cube of Specification with length , width and height to be zero. You will say there exist no cube.
The same thing is with big bang , how infinite mass can confine into Zero volume ? You may say don’t talk philosophically prove with physics , So let’s dive into physics.
The big bang theory states that Singularity had infinite temp. , and in that singularity of infinite temp there was infinite mass. According to physics if any object have some temp. , because of temp the particle vibrates. So if there is small temp , small vibrations of particles can be seen and with increment of temp. ,vibration of particles also increase. let’s have a look on 4 possibilities of an object under some temp.
- An Object with single particle and low temp
- multiple particle with low temp
- highest temp and single particle
- multiple particle with highest temp.
Vibration will be always there no matter how many no. of particle and how much temp.
Now, if we talk about big bang, it is totally different case from all above 4 possibilities.
It is a case of infinite particles under an infinite temp.
Now just think, If we cannot deny occurrence of vibration in above 4 possibilities how can we deny occurrence of vibration in case of big bang where the temp is infinite.
- If vibration occurs , means motion occurs
- Motion need space , and existence of space denies zero volume.
In the Singularity even a single particle cannot stay in zero volume under existence of infinite temp. then how infinite particle can stay in zero volume ? Isn’t it a BIG LIE ?
Well, In my view a single particle will also need enough space to stay even under absolute zero temp.
Because of such problem ,In 2004 Stephen Hawking changed his view and while talking about Big Bang theory on discovery channel He said “The mass was confined into a point.” instead of saying “A point of zero radius”.
But , Still !
If it was a point ,Yet it is impossible for infinite mass to confine into a point.
One may argue and say that Energy have no mass and Infinite mass was confined into zero volume in form of energy , Hence It is possible.
Let’s test this argument too
If we consider above argument then it will be a case of “Zero mass in Zero Volume” not “Infinite mass in zero volume” as big bang theory states and another wrong thing with the argument is –
it consider energy to be mass-less which is not true.
Energy is not Mass-less
Photons are called “packets of energy” and considered to be mass-less , which in turn proves that energy is mass-less.
Well, No !
If photons are mass-less , the question is –
Why they are affected by gravitational force ?
Anything which is affected by gravity have mass. It is clear when sunlight comes to earth , it gets bend because of gravity , If photons are mass-less, Light rays shouldn’t bend , it should go straight.
We also have a famous example which is acceptable for everyone is black hole, Photons cannot escape a black hole. So photon must have some mass.
Again, Science says if something speeds up, it’s mass increases with increment in the speed , and finally at speed of light, mass should be infinite.
Now , With increment in speed of an object , we cannot consider that- this increase mass belongs to object,
if we consider it, then “Energy Conservation law” will violate. So the question is –
To whom this increased mass belongs ?
The answer is – It belongs to “Energy” because with increment of object’s speed the kinetic energy increases , so It is mass of “Energy” , hence energy is not mass-less.
Again, from the above principle – which states mass to be infinite at the speed of light – why can’t we conclude “photon” to be having infinite mass.
Why not to apply this principle on photon itself ? So if someone consider this principle then it proves photon also have mass.
According to Einstein mass and energy are convertible to each other, then why not to consider energy having some mass ? Any explanation why energy losses the mass in conversion ?
From above analysis we can conclude energy is not mass-less.
2.The Loophole of Time in Big Bang
The big bang theory states that at the beginning “there was no time” ,
Now A question arises If there was “No Time” then how the explosion happened ?
Again when there was no time or there was zero time then, in absence of time “no action” can occur.
“No motion” can occur , so how explosion or expansion occurred in absence of time ?
On discovery channel when talking about travelling in future Stephen talks about “Time”and he explain that-
When time becomes slow our action such as physical movement also become slow , All moving object become slow.
So that means if time approaches to zero , there cannot be any action , any motion.
If any natural action cannot occur then how big bang occurred ? and why it occurred ? what caused it to occur ?
Previously we have proved that motion will occur under temp.
- If motion Occurs- That mean some action or natural action is happens.
- If some natural action or motion occurred – That means “Time” cannot be “Zero”
As according to science time was zero , So once Sir Stephen Said -There was “no time” for God to exist ,If we consider it then the same thing can also be said that –
There was “No Time” for Big bang to Occur too.
We have showed many facts to be false in big bang theory, Now let’s move to our next milestone.
3.The Explosion in Big Bang
Earlier we have studied that a bang occurred at Singularity and universe expanded from singularity greater than speed of light.
Now if you know how an explosion occur you will find another mistake in Big bang.
For a simple explosion you can take an example of Firecracker.
When explosion occurs at the center of firecracker , what happen is-
All the particles move away from the center Even the air also moves out and for an instance there exist a spherical vacuum at the center of explosion.
At the next moment vacuum vanishes away because of outer air pressure.
So, We can observe the presence of vacuum at the center of explosion in a fire cracker , and the same observation one can easily see in any explosion.
Now the same should happen with the BIG explosion of big bang , and there should be a very huge spherical Void with only empty space.
This empty space or BIG vacuum will not vanish away as we observed in a Firecracker because there is no outer pressure exist in Big Bang.
So if Big Bang Occurred , There must be a very huge space exist in the universe where only emptiness can be found as the universe is still expanding, So that space should exist.
BUT such space is not being observed till now , and that proves big bang never happened.
One may say that there exist some big Voids like Boots Void and Super Void , but these voids are nothing in front of the void of big bang. The speed of big bang expansion was 10ˆ28 m/s that means 10ˆ20 times the speed of light.
At such speed it will cover such boots void in just fractions of second, So you can understand that the void of big bang must be unimaginably big.
Some other articles to read-
- Vedic Rashmi Theory of Universe – A new Unique Theory
- Debate between theist and atheist
- Existence of God on Libra of Logic
4. A BIG Problem with Big-Bang
Earlier, We also studied a fact that-
After some time of explosion 2 Force were came into existence
Now that’s again a loophole in big-bang. There are two possibilities exist:
- If 2 force produced then in the beginning there was “No Force”
- In the beginning there was “one force” which further separated into 2 Forces.
Now 2 Question emerges here:
- If there was no force in the beginning then how the whole mass of universe was confined into a single point, what bounded the whole mass of universe inside a point in absence of force ?
- If there was “One Force” then Force cannot be beginning-less because earlier we told that big-bang doesn’t tell you what was before Singularity ?
So they believe The singularity was beginning-less that is why they don’t take interest in finding previous state before singularity.
So if the singularity was existed from beginning-less time , this force cannot be considered to be beginning-less as the force is of changeable nature.
Something changeable cannot be beginning-less and if someone consider this force to be unchangeable then again there is no place for big bang to occur , occurrence of big bang itself tells that force is changeable.
5.Why No Space For “Space ?”
As we earlier discussed , we made clear that existence of vibration cannot be denied.
So , In existence of vibration existence of space also cannot be denied, but in the theory there is no space for “space”
As Sir Stephen also accepted point size of universe , and a point size always need a point space , so from the statement of Sir Stephen it is clear that “There was space”
What should be Initial Stage Of Universe ?
When we talk about Initial stage of universe there are some parameters like density , temp. , light, etc.
If we consider any amount of these parameter in the initial stage of universe.
There will arise a question that how this parameter increased ? What was before that ?
Suppose if i consider some amount of temp. , let’s take 1 deg. C , then there will be a question arises that what was before that temp ? because temperature is changeable entity , and such changeable nature must had another amount of temp before 1 deg C , either less or more.
So there will be always a possibility exist and in such situation we cannot term it to be Initial stage of Universe.
In our view, in the initial state such basic property should be zero, by zero we mean properties to be inactive.
BUT expansion of universe proved Big Bang
If we consider universe to be expanding it proved the Big Bang theory , and scientist have confirmed that our universe is expanding then how one can say Big Bang theory is wrong ?
Well, We have proved that Universe is not expanding even if we consider the Doppler effect as a cause of red shift , it doesn’t prove an expanding universe.
Finally In our article we denied All of above facts and we concluded that
- Infinite mass cannot be confined into “zero volume” and even into a Single Point.
- In beginning there was “Time”
- In beginning there was “Space”
- Big-bang cannot be initial state of Universe.
- If Big-Bang existed there must exist a huge unimaginable empty space in the Universe.
Finally in our view Big-Bang cannot explain Creation of universe.
We also believe that just questioning any theory is not appropriate instead we must give answer too.
We must provide some solution too ,So in future we will also provide a new theory which explain universe in better way.
Note- I have done above analysis with the help of understanding the view of great Indian Vedic scientist Acharya Agnivrat Naisthik and let me clear you that because of above points slight changes happened to big bang theory Yet another fact is that in today’s commercialized Science there exist an unfare approach , proper credits are not given the peoples, Get ready to know about the next part of this same story, will come with the next part very soon.